What is the difference in muscle performance between people who work out on an empty stomach and those who work out after meals?

Fitness has always been a delicate job. Don't look at the sweaty muscular men in the strength zone of the gym. The reason why they can build a whole body of muscles is because they are thick and thin. How to train, how to eat, these are the fitness details that need to be paid attention to, and the sensitivity to these details must be maintained for a long time. The reason why some people can’t build a muscular figure or the road to gaining muscle is bumpy is most likely because he didn’t pay attention to certain fitness details, such as the gap between fasting fitness and after-dinner fitness.

Bodybuilders have roughly the same purpose of training, most of them are to build a perfect body, but everyone's fitness habits are different, some people are used to working out on an empty stomach, while some people like to start training after eating. In fact, fitness does not have specific rigid requirements for fasting training or post-meal training, but choosing different methods will have different muscle-building effects, so people who work out on an empty stomach and those who work out after meals at the same time, and finally their muscle effects What will be the difference, who will gain better muscle?

muscle loss

First of all, the author does not recommend people with hypoglycemia to exercise on an empty stomach. I have heard that many people who exercise on an empty stomach have black eyes or even fainted during training. Energy overdraws the body. Moreover, exercising on an empty stomach will also consume muscles to a certain extent, causing the original muscles to be converted into the exercise energy needed by the body, resulting in muscle loss. I believe this result is something no muscle gainer wants to see.

Gaps in muscle gain

Although fitness under the fasting state is also effective training, and protein supplementation can also increase some muscles afterward, but in popular terms, this kind of fitness method is tearing down the east wall to make up for the west wall, with little effect. People who work out after a meal will not lose their own energy for training because they have food in their stomachs for their bodies to consume, and then keep up with the nutritional supplements after training, and their muscles will be fully developed. So relatively speaking, the muscle-building effect of exercising after a meal is better than exercising on an empty stomach.

Gaps in Muscle Training Quality

Generally, people who lose weight prefer to exercise on an empty stomach, because it is more conducive to burning fat without eating, thereby improving the weight loss effect, but from a health perspective, it is still not advisable to exercise on an empty stomach. If you do strength training on an empty stomach, your body will consume a lot of energy at this time. If you train while hungry, it is conceivable that the quality of the training may be mediocre, and if the muscles are not fully trained, the effect of increasing muscle will be compromised in the end. Those who choose to exercise after meals do not have to worry about physical protests during the training process, so their training experience will be better, and their muscles can be fully trained, so the effect of muscle building will be more prominent.

Generally speaking, fitness still needs to pay more attention to details as mentioned above. A small fasting and eating may cause a huge gap in muscle performance. Looking at it now, it is obvious that exercising after meals is more advantageous. I believe this is also the choice of most bodybuilders. Of course, there are people who exercise on an empty stomach or after meals. You can choose whichever method is more suitable for you. The premise is to ensure the health of the body.

Do you think people who work out on an empty stomach have an advantage or people who work out after meals have an advantage?