Who will the property belong to in the future? The mother-daughter dialogue is hot, and the mother's answer is so straightforward.
I don't know when it started, there is a popular "send proposition" between mothers and daughters, which is similar to "your mother and I fell into the water at the same time, who do you save first", the question of this sending proposition is like this, the daughter asks her mother , who bought your new clothes, mother answered, daughter bought it, who bought your necklace, mother answered, daughter bought it, who bought your ring, mother answered the same, daughter bought it Yes, at this time, my daughter's painting style has changed. Who do you give the money you earn? The mother's answer is also quite simply, to the son! Then, the embarrassed laughter of your daughter came, your thoughts are so clear.
Regarding the distribution of property, whether it is only a son or only a daughter, it is easy to solve. There is no suspense in the distribution of property of an only child. If there are two sons or two daughters, it is a big deal, and there may only be one son and one daughter. It is difficult for parents to answer. In reality, more parents tend to distribute their property to their sons. As for daughters, if they marry, they will belong to other people. How can they care about the property of their parents?
It seems that there is nothing wrong with this kind of thinking. Since ancient times, daughters who have been married have poured out water, but with the development of society, girls and boys have become equal, and even daughters are more family-oriented. , Take parents' four seasons clothes and jewelry as an example, most of them are filial piety by daughters. When Mother's Day and Father's Day are coming, daughters also work hard to buy them, so mothers praise everyone, daughters are filial, and the family members Inside and outside, there seems to be a shadow of the daughter, even if the parents are sick, the daughter will always accompany the parents no matter how busy the family is, but why is it that the parents are naturally biased in exchange for such efforts? They have already made plans from the heart, no matter how filial their daughters are, their property will not have their daughter's share.
One son and one daughter, what do you think of the parents who give all their property to their sons?
expecting his son to retire
In the eyes of most parents (mostly those born in the 50s and 60s), the son is the mainstay of the family. They believe that filial piety is innate for daughters. In the eyes of parents, sons and daughters are like new clothes and old clothes. New clothes look bright, and they may only be worn once or twice in a lifetime. The daughter is the old one. Clothes are comfortable and warm, but you can't take them out of the door when you wear them every day. From this point of view, even if a daughter is filial every day, but she is really old, she still has to rely on her son. The hope here is not how considerate the son is when his parents are sick, but If the parents really left, the family needs to be supported by the son. He is the successor. No matter how good the daughter is, how long can she stay at her parents' house? From this point of view, the son is the root of the family, and of course the property must be given to the son.
Property cannot be left to outsiders
Parents often say a word, no matter how good a daughter is, she will marry a man after all, and her future life will depend on what kind of person she is married to. Parents believe in marrying a chicken, a chicken, a dog, a dog, and a person who married a man. Even if a daughter is not a member of her family, her family is likened by many people to the son's country, the daughter's inn, the daughter just rests when she comes back, and what happens in the future depends on her own good fortune. Having a daughter is equivalent to giving it to an outsider, of course not.
Why is the property given to the son while the daughter is still happy?
Filial piety to parents without expecting anything in return
It is strange that many parents give their property to their sons, buy a house and a car for their sons, and give their daughters only a little dowry, but the daughters are still happy and filial to their parents without any resentment. In fact, the daughters Their idea is very simple. As long as the parents are happy, she is happy. The property is earned by the parents themselves. The children can't say anything to whoever is given or not. It doesn't matter whether the property is given or not. This may be the ultimate kind of filial piety.
Habit is second nature
Looking around, most parents leave their property to their sons, so it's natural for them to get used to it. All daughters come here. Their habitual thinking decides that they won't care about their parents' property. Of course, some parents have instilled this kind of behavior since childhood. Thought, in the future, everything in the family will belong to the younger brother or the elder brother. There is no expectation and no resentment.
It is also a relief not to fight for property
The property is given to the son, and the son of course has to bear the main responsibility of support. In many places, there is such a custom. When parents are old, they eat their sons and use their sons. Now, the responsibility of supporting daughters is lighter, so when the parents are old, this is also a kind of relief.
Of course, there are also daughters who have not received a share of property, but are required to have the same maintenance obligations as their sons. There are great conflicts in the family. This is actually due to the partiality of the parents. Although filial piety to parents is what every child should do Yes, but only if you are treated fairly and justly. If you have a son and a daughter, how would you distribute your property? If the property is given to the son, will the daughter be required to be as filial as the son? All are welcome to express their opinions.